Microsoft Partner ID 7158199SOC 2 Type I in progressIP transfer includedNDA-first engagement

Topic

AI Agents and Agentic Workflows

An AI agent is a system where a model decides what to do next, calls tools or APIs, observes the result, and repeats until a goal is met. That autonomy is what makes agents useful and what makes them fail. Most agent incidents in production trace back to tool execution and orchestration, not to the model.

This is where we spend most of our engineering. The pieces that decide whether an agent ships are unglamorous: retries and fallbacks on every tool call, an evaluation harness that runs before go-live, confidence thresholds that route to a human, and audit trails on every decision. The writing below is what we have learned building and running them.

What we would tell you on a call

Most agent failures are tool failures

The model is rarely the thing that breaks. An agent calls an API that times out, returns a shape nobody expected, or succeeds twice because the retry was not idempotent. Design the tool layer as you would any distributed system and most incidents disappear.

Autonomy is a dial, not a switch

The useful question is not whether the agent is autonomous but what it is allowed to do without asking. Route low-confidence decisions to a person, keep the high-volume routine ones automatic, and move the threshold as the evaluation data earns it.

An evaluation harness before go-live, not after

A test set of real cases, run in CI, is what lets you change a prompt or a model on a Tuesday without finding out on Friday. Teams that skip it end up unable to change anything safely, which is a worse outcome than a slightly weaker agent.

Audit trails are a product requirement

In regulated work the agent has to be able to show what it did and why, at the time it did it. Retrofitting that is expensive; writing every decision to an immutable trail from the first sprint is not.

Everything we have written on this

Proof in production

Key terms

AI agent
A system where a language model chooses actions, calls tools or APIs, observes the results, and repeats until a goal is met or it stops. The distinguishing feature is that the model decides what to do next, rather than following a fixed script.
Agentic AI
A broader description of systems that pursue goals over multiple steps with some autonomy, usually coordinating several agents, tools, and checkpoints. Agentic AI describes the overall approach, an AI agent is a component within it.
Orchestration
The layer that controls how a multi-step AI process runs: what happens in what order, what state carries between steps, what to do on failure, and when to stop.Most production agent incidents trace back to orchestration and tool failure handling, not to the model.
Human in the loop
A design where a person approves, edits, or overrides an AI decision before it takes effect, usually on the actions that are expensive or irreversible.

The service behind this

AI Agents and Automation

Replace repetitive workflows with intelligent agents.

EYBooking.comHindustan UnileverPixis
SOC2 Type I In Progress
Code ownership, IP transfer, NDAs and security review standard on every engagement