Work across the wider enterprise estate, including the platforms that sit either side of a Dynamics or Salesforce core.
We map the systems and processes you have now, agree the scope worth doing first, and put a phased plan against it.
We configure and build what is in scope, then wire it to the systems either side of it.
Data is migrated and reconciled against source totals, then tested and signed off before anyone relies on it.
We run the cutover, stabilise it, document what was built and hand it to your team.
Order of magnitude, not a quote. We will not price your programme before we have read your configuration, but you should be able to tell from these whether we are in your range before you spend a meeting finding out.
2 to 3 weeks
$8k to $15k
We go through the estate and the processes around it, and come back with the gaps, the options and what each one costs to close. You own the output whether or not we do the work.
8 to 16 weeks, phased
$40k to $200k, by platform
A defined piece of work with a fixed scope, a named team and a go-live date: a module, a migration, an integration set or a reporting layer. Where the work sits inside one country and one operating model, this is usually the right shape and the cheapest way to prove the platform.
9 to 18 months, phased in country waves
From $350k
A multi-entity or multi-country rollout run with programme governance: a global template designed once, then deployed in country waves with the localisation, statutory reporting and tax obligations sequenced ahead of each go-live. It comes with a programme lead, a template change process and a deployment lead per wave, because a rollout of this shape fails on governance long before it fails on configuration.
Rolling, minimum 3 months
$14k to $28k per month
Ongoing senior capacity that sits inside your programme under your delivery lead, extending and maintaining the estate alongside your own team.
Whichever costs less over five years. Plenty of estates are best left with SAP as the ledger and something lighter in front of it. The assessment gives you both numbers.
Yes. We deliver on Oracle, PeopleSoft and Workday directly, as well as at the integration and data layer between them and a Dynamics or Salesforce core. If a piece of work needs a skill we do not hold, we will say so rather than learn it on your budget.
Two to three weeks for a scoped assessment covering current state, options and costs. Longer selections are usually longer because of internal alignment, not analysis.
Often not where the vendor slide says. A two-tier shape, with the group ledger on one platform and lighter entities on another, is a legitimate answer and sometimes the cheaper one over five years. What it costs you is the consolidation and intercompany layer, which then has to be designed rather than assumed. The assessment gives you both paths with the numbers, including the option of leaving a market where it already is.
The obligations do not change at all. They belong to the legal entity and the jurisdiction, not to the software. What changes is where the work is done and how the output reaches the group. We map the obligations per market first, then decide which system produces each one, because doing it the other way round is how a group discovers in a filing period that nothing owns a return.
Related
Bring the process that is breaking and we will tell you what it takes to fix it, including when the answer is not a project.
