Access, data handling and audit position, set up so procurement and internal audit both clear it.
We map the systems and processes you have now, agree the scope worth doing first, and put a phased plan against it.
We configure and build what is in scope, then wire it to the systems either side of it.
Data is migrated and reconciled against source totals, then tested and signed off before anyone relies on it.
We run the cutover, stabilise it, document what was built and hand it to your team.
Order of magnitude, not a quote. We will not price your programme before we have read your configuration, but you should be able to tell from these whether we are in your range before you spend a meeting finding out.
2 to 3 weeks
$8k to $15k
We go through the estate and the processes around it, and come back with the gaps, the options and what each one costs to close. You own the output whether or not we do the work.
8 to 16 weeks, phased
$40k to $200k, by platform
A defined piece of work with a fixed scope, a named team and a go-live date: a module, a migration, an integration set or a reporting layer. Where the work sits inside one country and one operating model, this is usually the right shape and the cheapest way to prove the platform.
9 to 18 months, phased in country waves
From $350k
A multi-entity or multi-country rollout run with programme governance: a global template designed once, then deployed in country waves with the localisation, statutory reporting and tax obligations sequenced ahead of each go-live. It comes with a programme lead, a template change process and a deployment lead per wave, because a rollout of this shape fails on governance long before it fails on configuration.
Rolling, minimum 3 months
$14k to $28k per month
Ongoing senior capacity that sits inside your programme under your delivery lead, extending and maintaining the estate alongside your own team.
The analysis takes days. Resolving it takes longer, because the conflicts are usually there for an operational reason. We give you the conflicts, the business impact of each fix, and a sequence.
No. This is your platform configuration and evidence position. It makes those audits far less painful, but it is not the audit itself.
Your team. We build the process and the reporting so a review is a scheduled task rather than a project, and hand it over.
Related
Bring the process that is breaking and we will tell you what it takes to fix it, including when the answer is not a project.
