Moving off systems that are out of support, with the data proven correct before anyone goes live.
We map the systems and processes you have now, agree the scope worth doing first, and put a phased plan against it.
We configure and build what is in scope, then wire it to the systems either side of it.
Data is migrated and reconciled against source totals, then tested and signed off before anyone relies on it.
We run the cutover, stabilise it, document what was built and hand it to your team.
Order of magnitude, not a quote. We will not price your programme before we have read your configuration, but you should be able to tell from these whether we are in your range before you spend a meeting finding out.
2 to 3 weeks
$8k to $15k
We go through the estate and the processes around it, and come back with the gaps, the options and what each one costs to close. You own the output whether or not we do the work.
8 to 16 weeks, phased
$40k to $200k, by platform
A defined piece of work with a fixed scope, a named team and a go-live date: a module, a migration, an integration set or a reporting layer. Where the work sits inside one country and one operating model, this is usually the right shape and the cheapest way to prove the platform.
9 to 18 months, phased in country waves
From $350k
A multi-entity or multi-country rollout run with programme governance: a global template designed once, then deployed in country waves with the localisation, statutory reporting and tax obligations sequenced ahead of each go-live. It comes with a programme lead, a template change process and a deployment lead per wave, because a rollout of this shape fails on governance long before it fails on configuration.
Rolling, minimum 3 months
$14k to $28k per month
Ongoing senior capacity that sits inside your programme under your delivery lead, extending and maintaining the estate alongside your own team.
At least one full rehearsal with reconciliation, usually two. A cutover nobody has practised is a cutover with an unknown duration.
Urgent enough to plan now and not urgent enough to rush. The risk is that an unsupported platform gives you no room when something does break, and a rushed migration produces a ledger nobody trusts.
Rarely worth it. We keep what is needed live, archive the rest somewhere queryable, and make that a decision rather than an accident.
Related
Bring the process that is breaking and we will tell you what it takes to fix it, including when the answer is not a project.
