A mid-market finance and operations rollout, from fit-gap to a stabilised go-live.
Illustrative. This is a walkthrough of how we run this kind of engagement, not an account of a specific client project. It carries no client and no results, because none are being claimed. Delivered work, with measured outcomes, is on the work pages.
A company running finance on an ageing system with operations in spreadsheets alongside it. One legal entity, two warehouses, a close that takes longer every quarter.
We sit with finance and operations and walk the processes as they run today, including the workarounds. Every gap is written down with the cost of closing it, so scope becomes a decision rather than a discovery.
What you get
Modules are configured against the agreed design and the integrations are built. You see it working in a test environment throughout, not at the end.
What you get
Data comes across, gets reconciled to the source, and the cutover is rehearsed end to end. This is where most rollouts discover what they missed, which is why it is not left to the final fortnight.
What you get
Cutover happens on an agreed weekend. We stay on for the first close, because that is the moment the system either holds or does not.
What you get
The fit-gap register is the contract. New requests go on it with an estimate and a phase, and the sponsor decides. Nothing is absorbed silently, which is how timelines quietly slip.
We profile it in week two rather than week nine. If it is bad, you find out while there is still time to decide between cleaning it, cutting it, or moving the date.
Named availability is agreed in the plan. If your financial controller cannot be in user acceptance testing, we say so early rather than testing without them and discovering it at go-live.
Other shapes
