Skip to main content
ThinkscoopBusiness Applications
PartnerTalk to us
What we doPlatformsIndustriesProofMulti-countryTrust and securityPartner with usTalk to usThinkscoop home
Microsoft Partner ID 7158199SOC 2 Type I in progressIP transfer includedNDA-first engagement

Thinkscoop Business Applications
Implementation, integration and AI agents on the platforms your business already runs on.

Applications

  • Finance and supply chain
  • Customer engagement
  • Salesforce
  • Enterprise ERP and HCM

Build and run

  • Cloud and DevOps
  • Integration and custom development
  • Migration services
  • Managed services and support
  • Security and governance

The practice

  • All services
  • Platforms
  • Industries
  • Multi-country and localisation
  • How an engagement runs
  • Delivered work
  • Insights

Talk to us

  • Start a conversation
  • contact@thinkscoopinc.com
  • +91 7888558392
  • Trust and security
  • About the practice
  • Questions and answers

Registered entity

Thinkscoop Technologies LLP
40C, Aero Arcade, G-Block, Aerocity Near International Airport, Mohali, Punjab 140603, India
+91 7888558392 · contact@thinkscoopinc.com

Building software since 2017. Team based in India, working with clients across the United States, the UK, Australia and the Middle East. We hold no offices outside India and do not claim any.

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Cookies
  • Partner with us
  • Join our vendor list
  • All Thinkscoop practices
Microsoft, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Power BI, Copilot, Salesforce, Agentforce, SAP, Oracle, PeopleSoft and Workday are trademarks of their respective owners.
Business Applications/How an engagement runs/A CRM and ERP integration

A CRM and ERP integration

Making Salesforce and the ERP agree on the customer, the order and the revenue.

Illustrative. This is a walkthrough of how we run this kind of engagement, not an account of a specific client project. It carries no client and no results, because none are being claimed. Delivered work, with measured outcomes, is on the work pages.

The situation this assumes

Sales working in one system, finance in another, and a nightly file transfer in between that somebody rebuilds every time an upstream field changes.

Week by week

Weeks 1 to 2

Catalogue and contract

Every interface between the two systems gets written down with its direction, its trigger and its system of record. Most of the trouble in these estates is two systems both believing they own the same field.

What you get

  • Interface catalogue with a documented contract per system pair
  • System of record agreed field by field
  • Failure inventory: what breaks today and how often
  • Target architecture, point to point or middleware, with the reasoning
Weeks 3 to 7

Build and instrument

Interfaces are built with error handling, retries and logging from the start rather than added after the first incident.

What you get

  • Interfaces built to the agreed contracts
  • Error handling, retry logic and dead letter handling
  • Contract tests that fail when an upstream field changes
  • Alerting that reaches a person who can act
Weeks 8 to 12

Prove and hand over

Run in parallel with the old mechanism, compare, then retire the old one deliberately rather than letting it linger.

What you get

  • Parallel run with a discrepancy report
  • The previous mechanism decommissioned, not left running
  • Runbooks for the failures that will still happen
  • Handover to your team or to managed services

Where this gets difficult

Both teams believe they own the customer record

This is a business decision, not a technical one, and it gets escalated to a sponsor in week one. We will not build an integration on an unresolved ownership question, because it will fail in production as a data argument.

An upstream release changes a field silently

Contract tests catch it on the day rather than at month end. That is the difference between a ticket and a reconciliation exercise.

The old file transfer never gets switched off

Decommissioning is a scope item with a date, not an afterthought. Two mechanisms running in parallel indefinitely is how estates end up where this one started.

Delivered work on this

EY (Ernst & Young)72%reduction in report preparation timeEight source systems including ERPs, integrated inside the client's own Azure tenancy, with every generated claim cited to source and an immutable audit trail behind it. This is the integration and governance problem an ERP estate has, solved to Big Four evidence standards.Read the engagementGlobal FinTech (Confidential)78%reduction in processing timeReconciliation across three finance systems with compliance sign-off preserved and a full audit trail. The same problem an ERP finance team brings us, approached from the operations side.Read the engagement

Shape

  • 8 to 12 weeks
  • A delivery lead, an integration engineer, one platform consultant per side

Services involved

  • Integration and custom development
  • Salesforce
  • Customer engagement
Talk to us

Other shapes

The engagements we run most often.

A multi-country Finance and Operations rolloutA Business Central rolloutA migration off legacy DynamicsA Power Platform governance reset