Large estates are rarely single vendor. An SAP ledger, an Oracle warehouse, Workday for people and a Dynamics or Salesforce front end is an ordinary picture, and no single vendor's methodology covers it. We work across the estate, and the work is usually in the joins.
What we do on it
Fit-gap against how you work, with options costed over five years rather than at licence signature. You own the output whether or not we do the work.
Delivery on the platform chosen, phased by entity, region or process rather than attempted in one cutover.
The seams between the core and the surrounding estate, which is where the cost and the risk actually sit.
Master data across systems that were never designed to meet, with an agreed owner for each domain.
Custom work built outside the core, on BTP or equivalent, so upgrades stay possible.
Ongoing application support across the estate rather than per platform, so nothing falls between two suppliers.
Products covered
Core finance and logistics, migration paths from ECC, and the process redesign that decides whether the move is worth making.
Extensions and integrations built outside the core so the core stays upgradeable.
Financials and supply chain, and the integration layer between Oracle and everything else in the estate.
Ongoing support, integration and, where it is the right answer, a costed path off it.
People data flowing into finance and operations correctly, which is where most Workday integration effort actually goes.
Running the choice against your processes rather than a vendor feature matrix, with the cost of each option written down.
Assessment first: what the move actually costs, what it gains, and whether the timing is yours or the vendor's.
A scoped selection run against your processes. Two to three weeks, and you keep the analysis regardless of the outcome.
Master data and integration work, usually starting with a single domain such as customer or product.
The most expensive pattern in enterprise IT. We take the seams as a defined scope with a single owner.
Whichever costs less over five years, and plenty of estates are best left with SAP as the ledger and something lighter in front of it. The assessment gives you both numbers rather than the one that suits us.
Yes, as well as at the integration and data layer between them and a Dynamics or Salesforce core. If a piece of work needs a skill we do not hold, we will say so rather than learn it on your budget.
We do not take vendor commission on selections, and the analysis is yours whatever you decide, including if you decide to keep what you have. That last outcome is more common than the industry admits.
Yes. It is a normal shape for us: a defined workstream, our own delivery lead, and reporting into your programme rather than around it.
Bring the process that is breaking and we will tell you what it takes to fix it, including when the answer is not a project.
